News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on /story/35677086. Parent comment

Re: by nothingeasy on Sunday April 23, 2023 @02:24PM (#35679053)
Wow, TIL "negative SEO attacks."
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re: by nadermx on Sunday April 23, 2023 @02:27PM (#35679087)
Has happened to my site as well, I gave up after doing around the same thing.. https://www.bing.com/search?q=site%3Apdf.to
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re: by tough on Sunday April 23, 2023 @02:32PM (#35679143)
Seems like a great extortion business

/s

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re: by nixcraft on Sunday April 23, 2023 @04:56PM (#35680524)
I think that is not the correct syntax. I just search for redhat.com and suse.com

https://www.bing.com/search?q=site%3Aredhat.com

https://www.bing.com/search?q=site%3Asuse.com

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re: by mdaniel on Sunday April 23, 2023 @05:53PM (#35681044)
It must be doing some kind of personalization for you, because when I load those two links in an incognito window, the first page is made up entirely of links to the constrained domains. That differs from the parent's link which in an incognito window just displays some kind of bing-looking error message
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re: by inafewwords on Monday April 24, 2023 @12:31AM (#35683672)
Old black hat SEO. Was never in that industry too seriously, but I did keep looped in my tech news as a kid as it gave me another perspective on the growth of the internet
[ Parent | on HN ]