News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Editors quit top neuroscience journal to protest against ... by AraceliHarker on Friday April 21, 2023 @11:32AM (#35655264)
This is because academics are assessed on their achievements based on how many articles they have published in prestigious journals.
Re:Editors quit top neuroscience journal to protest against ... by JumpCrisscross on Friday April 21, 2023 @11:35AM (#35655338)
> is because academics are assessed on their achievements based on how many articles they have published in prestigious journals

Why have these companies been so successful at curating prestigious journals?

I hate our academic publishing model. But I'm careful dismissing the journals as pure rent seekers. Their is a source to their staying power beyond merely habit.

Re:Editors quit top neuroscience journal to protest against ... by ska on Friday April 21, 2023 @11:56AM (#35655699)
Part of it is momentum, they date back from when a) everything was on paper, and b) producing and distributing the paper was hard.

However, I suspect much of the staying power is that organizing and executing on a top tier journal, or equivalently replacing it, is real work - and it is real work with no model for getting paid for or otherwise compensated for in an academic career.

There is also some value to being arms-length. A few top universities could gang together to pay for a flight of journals, but there would understandably be concerns about acceptance policies, etc.

Re:Editors quit top neuroscience journal to protest against ... by joquarky on Friday April 21, 2023 @09:41PM (#35662494)
It feels like they are subjecting themselves to the consequences of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart%27s_law