Re:Bark – GPT-style realistic multilingual text-to-speech ge...
by gs17 on Thursday April 20, 2023 @09:30PM
(#35648815)
It's open source, and even if it wasn't, it would likely be pretty easy to remove those (not that you would get GPS) from an audio file.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Bark – GPT-style realistic multilingual text-to-speech ge...
by CamperBob2 on Friday April 21, 2023 @02:30AM
(#35650398)
Hmm, I don't know about that. The data rate used by civilian GPS (L1 C/A) is only 50 bps. The symbols are normally spread over a couple MHz of bandwidth to make it possible to recover at levels below the thermal noise floor. I see no reason why the same thing couldn't be done at baseband, adding an imperceptible bit of extra noise to an audio signal.
Of course, you wouldn't encode real-time navigation data, but a small block of identifying text. Either way, though, someone without a copy of the spreading code isn't going to notice it or decode it. Given enough redundancy in both the time and frequency domains, removing it wouldn't be easy either.
Re:Bark – GPT-style realistic multilingual text-to-speech ge...
by BHSPitMonkey on Friday April 21, 2023 @03:24AM
(#35650722)
The real problem is that bad actors would simply encode some other person's coordinates/metadata into the recordings they produce, and we'll have been trained by then to blindly accept the presence of these markers as strong evidence of guilt.