Re:Imgur Updates TOS, Banning NSFW Content
by xmprt on Thursday April 20, 2023 @03:01AM
(#35637178)
I think the argument isn't that Reddit isn't corporate but rather that the original founders have thought it through a lot and have still decided to make this decision.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I'm sure Mark Zuckerberg thinks through all his major decisions a lot too. If you think a lot and your result is dark patterns, does that matter so much?
Re:Imgur Updates TOS, Banning NSFW Content
by saurik on Thursday April 20, 2023 @06:49AM
(#35638281)
You seem to be assuming that if one says "they know well what they are doing" that's a defense of their actions, but I'd think it is much more often a denigration of them...
Re:Imgur Updates TOS, Banning NSFW Content
by ajacksified on Saturday April 22, 2023 @03:46AM
(#35664283)
Exactly. I'm pointing out that what gp says:
> It may end up having a much larger impact than reddit corporate anticipates.
Is unlikely. I'm not adding an opinion on whether or not this is a good move, or a user-friendly move.