News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Future Blues – Emily's Cowboy Bebop Page (1999) by moron4hire on Sunday April 16, 2023 @11:26AM (#35590767)
This site works fine on mobile
Re:Future Blues – Emily's Cowboy Bebop Page (1999) by scotty79 on Sunday April 16, 2023 @11:40AM (#35590949)
Mobile design was something created for old phones that didn't have quite the resolution of computer monitors. Modern phones don't really need mobile designed sites.
Re:Future Blues – Emily's Cowboy Bebop Page (1999) by marginalia_nu on Sunday April 16, 2023 @11:49AM (#35591066)
Kinda doesn't though. Mobile most of all needs concessions for the much more limited input precision.
Re:Future Blues – Emily's Cowboy Bebop Page (1999) by scotty79 on Sunday April 16, 2023 @11:58AM (#35591178)
Personally I prefer pinch zoom for input precision instead of overly mobile design.
Re:Future Blues – Emily's Cowboy Bebop Page (1999) by cantaloa on Sunday April 16, 2023 @01:23PM (#35592119)
You need text to scale and reflow to device width if you want text to be readable. This is one of the main reasons for mobile web design. Else you're stuck panning around the screen to read the text zoomed in.

Once you decide to scale text to device size so that it's readable, you are stuck doing the rest of mobile web design (fluid layout).

Re:Future Blues – Emily's Cowboy Bebop Page (1999) by kbelder on Sunday April 16, 2023 @03:25PM (#35593420)
You need to allow users to scale text as desired, as the original web intended. You shouldn't make a site targeted to mobile; you should make a site that allows the user to display in their client as they wish.

The problem will fix itself.

Re:Future Blues – Emily's Cowboy Bebop Page (1999) by cantaloa on Sunday April 16, 2023 @04:39PM (#35594065)
I don't understand what that means in practice except to evangelize the tenets of mobile (fluid) design.

How are you going to make a site that lets the user display the site as they wish without just making a reflowable mobile-friendly site?

Desktop sites are generally static and have nonfluid components like sidebars which is how fluid design became necessary in the mobile age which seems to be what you are proposing.

Re:Future Blues – Emily's Cowboy Bebop Page (1999) by moonchrome on Sunday April 16, 2023 @12:36PM (#35591564)
If by fine you mean I need to zoom and pan to read it then I guess it does, but I doubt anyone would call that "working well on mobile".
Re:Future Blues – Emily's Cowboy Bebop Page (1999) by justsomehnguy on Sunday April 16, 2023 @01:12PM (#35591961)
I would take

>need to zoom and pan to read

over every time I forbidden to pan and zoom by the site author.

Especially when I'm behind 43" 4k monitor and the site decide

WHAT TEN LINES

PER SCREEN

IS EVERYTHING

I WISHED FOR

Re:Future Blues – Emily's Cowboy Bebop Page (1999) by FooBarBizBazz on Sunday April 16, 2023 @06:58PM (#35594974)
It works way better for me on mobile than most new sites do.

Developers assume everyone has the latest iPhone or Pixel. So they take like a minute to load, heat my phone up, drop the battery by 10%, and have a 20% chance of OOM-ing my browser.

The Guardian is the absolute worst at this. I don't know why, it brings mobile Firefox to its knees.

Basically, fancy "mobile friendly" JS is no good if it makes my phone stutter and go catatonic.

Whereas if people just wrote old school "CSS Zen Garden" sites, or even this old table stuff, any ancient phone could handle them easily.

But no, I need to go pay a kid to dig up more coltan.

I can scroll. It's ok. What I can't do is will my phone faster, without shelling out more stupid cash.