News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Artist refuses prize after his AI image wins at top photo... by neom on Saturday April 15, 2023 @01:52PM (#35582853)
I've told the story a few times on HN about the "cheating" in my 2007 Digital Imaging college photography contest for the Digital Imaging program[1]. In our instance, we're a totally (brand new) digital program, and someone combined some framed and created a scene that didn't exist, they shot the scenes separately and combined them. Our prof told folks to f'off when they complained as it was well within the lines. I agreed. That said...

This, seems outside the lines. Entering a photography contest with work that isn't based in photography, that you didn't shoot, isn't in the spirit of the contest. A photograph is an image created by light falling on a photosensitive surface - Edit all you want, hell edit till it's not even the same thing anymore, but if you're entering a photography content, at least trigger a shutter. The Sony photography awards are very clearly based around photography as the fundamental starting point. There are lots of pure digital art contests to enter, so enter them.

[1]https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35020010

Re:Artist refuses prize after his AI image wins at top photo... by hgsgm on Saturday April 15, 2023 @03:27PM (#35583799)
That's entirely the point of the OP. To promote AI segregation on art contests, and not let AI secretly win every photo contest.
Re:Artist refuses prize after his AI image wins at top photo... by filoleg on Saturday April 15, 2023 @04:28PM (#35584232)
Agreed. For something like a photography contest, I am surprised they didn't have explicitly defined rules around it, like requiring contestants to provide the original RAW image (as a proof of work), having an explicit list of what is allowed to be tweaked (and nothing else would be allowed) like brightness/color grading/etc.