News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:U.S. may change how it monitors the web after missing lea... by kevin_thibedeau on Saturday April 15, 2023 @12:13PM (#35581973)
The solution is to isolate systems with SIPRNet access and not permit writable media to be attached to them nor access to printers. This has been possible for decades. The problem is that the military doesn't take security seriously. They should have learned their lesson with Manning and clearly didn't.
Re:U.S. may change how it monitors the web after missing lea... by thewildginger on Saturday April 15, 2023 @01:17PM (#35582544)
>nor access to printers

You fail to realize what you're asking. The military is a system where the older you are while surviving the institution, the more pull you have. These dinosaurs are what stop this from happening. They ignore a reality where the things THEY understand do not exist and have priority. The average O-1 officer can't imagine themselves or their command not having certain communication tools. The Boss at the top? Just yell louder, it's how wars have been won in the past, it should work now. The joint chiefs of staff are not young, and have every intention to keep it that way.

Telling the DoD no printers would legit cause an existential crisis for career officers. You cannot suggest something less popular among them. This is not an exaggeration. Do you think a tank platoon commander, or submarine commander, can imagine an operations room without paper laying around? Because they cannot imagine it, it does not exist. While I agree this is the way forward, it will not happen for another 20 years.

Re:U.S. may change how it monitors the web after missing lea... by kevin_thibedeau on Saturday April 15, 2023 @01:54PM (#35582883)
It wouldn't be a stretch to commission a modern secure Kindle DX for document handling. The rule wouldn't be no printers ever. It would be no exfiltration of secret materials. That stuff doesn't need to be handled in a sheaf of papers. Everyday non-secret (ie low impact damage) material can continue as is.

DoD contractors are under heavy scrutiny and face severe repercussions for leaks. They've been operating this way for decades.