Re:Meta faces ‘morale crisis’ as top execs work from other c...
by baby on Saturday April 15, 2023 @08:43AM
(#35580135)
As usually with these kind of posts, what’s happening inside the company (which is composed of many divisions and geographic locations, etc.) and what people perceive from the outside are two completely different things. I would not take this article at face value. There’s been such an article every month since the 2016 elections. They are useless, don’t lead to any interesting discussions on HN, yet people continue to upvote them to the FO because “hurr durr facebook is evil”
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Meta faces ‘morale crisis’ as top execs work from other c...
by chank on Saturday April 15, 2023 @09:37AM
(#35580523)
A lot of large companies stage senior execs in places to simply say they have business presence for tax purposes. Just look at any company that has a bunch of top execs in Switzerland but don't actually make anything there.
Re:Meta faces ‘morale crisis’ as top execs work from other c...
by cudgy on Saturday April 15, 2023 @09:49PM
(#35586511)
Do they have to be top execs to have a presence?
Re:Meta faces ‘morale crisis’ as top execs work from other c...
by chank on Tuesday April 18, 2023 @10:33AM
(#35614547)
I'm not sure of the exact qualifications, but some senior business owner typically needs to be included. I believe there is a headcount requirement as well, but no requirements on what that headcount does. Most large companies have zero issues meeting the requirements. For a small business/startup it's likely not worth it.
Re:Meta faces ‘morale crisis’ as top execs work from other c...
by tester756 on Saturday April 15, 2023 @09:13AM
(#35580338)
Exactly
News medias talk about companies that hire 100 000s people, across 10s of countries, cultures, etc, etc and then write their stories basing on opinion of 4 random employees