Re:RBS shuts down startup accounts (Smarkets and others)
by ocirion on Monday February 06, 2012 @10:24AM
(#3557675)
That would be like banning liquor stores or corner shops selling cigarettes.
The monopoly is because the government wants a piece of it. The potential of gambling sites to make huge amounts of money is why the government takes any interest. They will restrict them and/or tax them to fill their own coffers.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:RBS shuts down startup accounts (Smarkets and others)
by Leynos on Monday February 06, 2012 @10:32AM
(#3557699)
As a parallel example, there are states in America where the only off-licences (liquor stores) permitted to operate are the state run monopoly.
My understanding of the reasoning behind this is centred around morality, although I imagine there's also a financial incentive for the state to maintain this control.
Re:RBS shuts down startup accounts (Smarkets and others)
by jeltz on Monday February 06, 2012 @12:37PM
(#3558293)
This is quite obvious in Europe. This financial crisis has spawned a surge in interest in stronger government regulation of gambling throughout Europe. A couple of years ago there was little to no interest.