News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Building LLM Applications for Production. Parent comment

Re:Building LLM Applications for Production by roflyear on Friday April 14, 2023 @07:59PM (#35576324)
I think it's way better than 70%, probably 95%+ even with bad data and poor prompts. I'd have to run more numbers but it's definitely better than 70%.

You can get to 99.9%+ with good data and well designed prompts. I'm sure it would be above 90% even with almost intentionally bad prompts, tbh.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Building LLM Applications for Production by iudqnolq on Friday April 14, 2023 @08:29PM (#35576491)
It's definitely not that good if we share a definition of poor data/prompts.

This afternoon I tried to use Codium to autocomplete some capnproto Rust code. Everything it generated was totally wrong. For example, it used member functions on non-existent structs rather than the correct free functions.

But I'll give it some credit: that's an obscure library in a less popular language.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Building LLM Applications for Production by roflyear on Saturday April 15, 2023 @09:14AM (#35580349)
> This afternoon I tried to use Codium to autocomplete some capnproto Rust code.

This isn't what I said at all. I said with summarizing data.

[ Parent | on HN ]