Re:What's the Least Impactful Way to Spend $300,000,000?
by j0hnyl on Thursday April 13, 2023 @10:58PM
(#35565029)
Who cares what some rich guy's vanity spend is. You might argue it's not impactful, but it certainly doesn't hurt anyone.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:What's the Least Impactful Way to Spend $300,000,000?
by bboygravity on Friday April 14, 2023 @12:23AM
(#35565492)
Also a criminal who will likely end up in jail at some point. His companies aren't exactly uncontroversial.
There's a reason people call this guy (Ken Griffin) Madoff 2.0
Re:What's the Least Impactful Way to Spend $300,000,000?
by lordnacho on Friday April 14, 2023 @02:08AM
(#35566058)
Why on earth would he end up in jail? No don't just tell us to Google it, obviously it won't turn up anything. What allegations are you referring to?
Re:What's the Least Impactful Way to Spend $300,000,000?
by boeingUH60 on Friday April 14, 2023 @05:39AM
(#35567365)
The person you're responding to is likely a member of the meme stock doomsday cult that keeps blaming Ken Griffin for their AMC/GameStop losses.
Re:What's the Least Impactful Way to Spend $300,000,000?
by nmca on Friday April 14, 2023 @04:49AM
(#35567096)
Opportunity costs are real. Opportunity costs are real.
Opportunity costs ARE REAL.
OPPORTUNITY COSTS ARE REAL.
¡¡¡ OPPORTUNITY COSTS ARE REAL !!!
Re:What's the Least Impactful Way to Spend $300,000,000?
by j0hnyl on Friday April 14, 2023 @09:08AM
(#35569178)
Ok, but the opportunity costs pertain solely to the spender, and even if not they are priced into the market. why do you feel entitled to the fortune that someone else decides to use for a vanity project.
Re:What's the Least Impactful Way to Spend $300,000,000?
by 27153 on Saturday April 15, 2023 @12:57PM
(#35582352)
How do the costs not apply to the tens of thousands of lives that could have been saved?
Re:What's the Least Impactful Way to Spend $300,000,000?
by j0hnyl on Monday April 17, 2023 @11:10AM
(#35601943)
Because the thousands of lives were never entitled to how someone decides to spend their money in the first place, and if you believe otherwise then this literally applies to everyone and their income. Example: How can we justify going out for an ice cream, when that same money could be spent to vaccinate several people from malaria and save their lives? Why is it ok for middle class earners to spend money on frivolous things, but not for the wealthy? All that surplus money can save tens of thousands of lives!