GPT-4 Outperforms Elite Crowdworkers, Saving Researchers $500k and 20k hours

Re:GPT-4 Outperforms Elite Crowdworkers, Saving Researchers ... by troops_h8r on Thursday April 13, 2023 @06:31PM (#35563033)

Hard agree. I'm really trying to figure out how to inject this idea into my friends' heads effectively. The main struggle I'm facing is how to convey the danger behind it. Why can it be deadly exactly? What can a program actually do to harm people, to the level where it's a risk of extinction or societal collapse?

Personally I didn't need to imagine a specific scenario to understand that there's risk, but I think it would help me convince other folks if I did.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPT-4 Outperforms Elite Crowdworkers, Saving Researchers ... by alex7734 on Friday April 14, 2023 @03:33AM (#35566578)

> risk of [...] or societal collapse

If you want society to collapse all you need to do is succeed in having AI automate all jobs.

Every single country where money comes from somewhere other than people (oil, diamonds...) is an authoritarian nightmare simply because keeping people happy is not necessary.

Once AI can do everything and robots that can do any physical labor are developed the population will shrink dramatically as people with killer robots kill each other for resources. There is no need for AI rebellion or AI failure to get there.

[ Parent | on HN ]