Re:Breaking Intel Exiting the Server Business Selling to MiTAC
by Patrick-STH on Thursday April 13, 2023 @12:32AM
(#35550980)
It is hard to title since they are stopping servers, but not server CPUs.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Breaking Intel Exiting the Server Business Selling to MiTAC
by coolandsmartrr on Thursday April 13, 2023 @01:14AM
(#35551244)
Maybe call them server units?
Re:Breaking Intel Exiting the Server Business Selling to MiTAC
by Patrick-STH on Thursday April 13, 2023 @02:16AM
(#35551726)
We are going to have a Dell PowerEdge review tomorrow. We call that a server or more than one servers not server units so that would feel strange to me.
Re:Breaking Intel Exiting the Server Business Selling to MiTAC
by coolandsmartrr on Friday April 14, 2023 @03:27AM
(#35566539)
I see, it's not easy to just call them "server units." Good to get input from those who actually use them.
Re:Breaking Intel Exiting the Server Business Selling to MiTAC
by kgwgk on Thursday April 13, 2023 @02:41AM
(#35551903)
"Exiting the server business" is unnecessarily ambiguous - "will no longer sell servers" would be an improvement.
Re:Breaking Intel Exiting the Server Business Selling to MiTAC
by mjevans on Thursday April 13, 2023 @03:50AM
(#35552329)
'completed server systems' maybe? Something that makes it clear it is a complete computing device, not just the core component of one.
Re:Breaking Intel Exiting the Server Business Selling to MiTAC
by Hamuko on Thursday April 13, 2023 @03:55AM
(#35552349)
I would've gone with "prebuilt servers" or "rackmounted servers". Those are of course simplifications, but would make it a bit clearer that it's referring to specific server hardware and not servers entirely.