News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Now live for all: Substack Notes by leobg on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @03:07PM (#35529831)
You said it well.

I actually suspect that many people hate him not in spite of what he has done, but because of it:

They think if they acknowledge what people like Elon Musk have done in their lives, they'd have to loathe themselves, their own choices, values and weaknesses.

Which is, of course, quite silly. Each human being has their own path in life. Comparing yourself to anyone, no matter who, is going to cause misery. But with people like Elon, the threat to the ego is particularly great.

So, hate and schadenfreude are the easy way out. "He, too, makes mistakes. So I'm not that worthless after all".

(The irony being that many of these people say that Elon Musk is self-centered. Though the question he is asking is "What do I believe is greatest good to humanity as a species", whereas they, by their very act of comparing themselves to him, are asking "How can I be greater than and more right than Elon Musk".)

Re:Now live for all: Substack Notes by timmytokyo on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @03:32PM (#35530238)
I actually suspect that people who idolize Elon Musk are subscribers to the Just World Fallacy, believing that he represents the kind of person that they -- though in a temporarily diminished and embarrassing state -- can become. They can't wait for the time when they too have the consequence-free power to sneer at disabled people, spread lies about victims of violent attacks, and call people who mildly disagree with them "pedo guy".

(By the way, I don't actually agree with any of what I wrote above. It's just another example of a bad-faith argument like the one I'm responding to.)

Re:Now live for all: Substack Notes by mlindner on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @05:59PM (#35532170)
> sneer at disabled people, spread lies about victims of violent attacks, and call people who mildly disagree with them "pedo guy".

Note: None of these things, as described, are things he actually did.

The disabled person was not sneered at. There was a misunderstanding of employment status and it was resolved and apologized for.

No lies were spread about a victim. He replied to a tweet that was spreading such lies, not spreading it himself.

The person who got called "pedo guy" was not in "mild disagreement". He was not called as such for disagreeing with Elon. (This is the most common mistake about this event that people repeat. Elon encourages disagreement against himself.) He was called as such for pushing similarly rude insults against Elon (calling for the sodomizing of Elon) and Elon responded in turn.

Re:Now live for all: Substack Notes by nemo44x on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @07:02PM (#35532879)
I could never accomplish what he has. He is so many standard deviations away from a regular person that it’s ridiculous to to feel anything but admiration. He’s human and imperfect like everyone and that’s ok. He was born with certain abilities and drive and he has made the world a better place by using those gifts. He is not beyond criticism either and some of his fans are too eager to dismiss them.
Re:Now live for all: Substack Notes by rvz on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @03:49PM (#35530511)
Precisely put. I wouldn't attempt to ignore his work on SpaceX, Tesla, etc since those companies have kickstarted their own revolution(s); electric vehicles and Starlink, even though I think Tesla FSD is a dangerous scam. Without it, the cars are fine.

Before, almost all the techies here were dreaming and begging to work for Elon Musk. Then the blue bird happened, got bought out and gave them 'emotional distress' and Elon immediately became public enemy number 1.

> So, hate and schadenfreude are the easy way out. "He, too, makes mistakes. So I'm not that worthless after all".

Hence that, the same techies who loved him are now eternally desperate for Twitter to be Elon's biggest failure as much as possible, giving 24/7 over-coverage about Twitter schadenfreude.

The manipulation of human psychology due to over-coverage and creating villains every month or year is just too easy to create a story out of that is guaranteed to attract eyeballs and clicks. It is an symptom of obsession.

Re:Now live for all: Substack Notes by mlindner on Wednesday April 12, 2023 @02:38AM (#35535816)
Curious question I have. What makes you think FSD is a “dangerous scam”? It’s quite functional even if it doesn’t quite meet the advertising yet. Maybe dangerous yes, but hardly a scam.
Re:Now live for all: Substack Notes by mlindner on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @05:57PM (#35532149)
I tend to agree. By tearing him down as much as they can, and making his minor issues stick out more than his major good sides they can offset his "worth" per-se. Additionally there's the narrative that all people with lots of money are automatically assumed to be evil, so if they're not evil they need to be torn down enough that they fit with the stereotype.