Re:I worked at Google for -10 days
by RussianCow on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @12:51PM
(#35527780)
I don't think it's that uncommon. I have personally worked at two companies that didn't do the background check until after employment (which I would never do again), and I've heard this anecdote a few times from others.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Were these companies startups or outside the U.S.? I’ve never heard of a big company doing a background check after start date, that makes no sense.
Re:I worked at Google for -10 days
by licebmi__at__ on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @01:54PM
(#35528674)
Bank of America did this for outside US contractors.
Re:I worked at Google for -10 days
by RussianCow on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @03:00PM
(#35529763)
These were US-based startups, to be clear. I would be surprised if very many larger companies did it this way since they generally have a formal process for this.
Re:I worked at Google for -10 days
by phpisthebest on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @12:59PM
(#35527899)
hmm I know for some position there has been a high first day no show rate, I wonder if that is what drives that position? Background checks while not super expensive are not cheap either and if you have a high number of people noping out before the first day I could see where they would want to mitigate those costs.
With the changes in drug laws, and this I have seen some companies starting to forgo pre-employment drug screens, which IMO is a good thing.
I am not sure what value most of these Pre-Employment checks provide anyway really.