News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We're building a browser when it's supposed to be impossible by cudgy on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @06:18AM (#35523069)
But how does developing a half-baked browser that targets some websites for fun refute that building a browser is impossible? Doesn’t it provide another example that it is impossible, at least for this team?
Re:We're building a browser when it's supposed to be impossible by ludston on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @06:59AM (#35523355)
Doesn't that depend on whether or not they end up making a browser in the end?
Re:We're building a browser when it's supposed to be impossible by paulryanrogers on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @09:02AM (#35524541)
Where is the end? And why claim you're doing the impossible until it's done?

It all comes off as puffery to me. Though the vertical slices approach is interesting, so I salute their efforts.

Re:We're building a browser when it's supposed to be impossible by asimpletune on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @08:26AM (#35524210)
Well, it takes time to make something big. And, one way to do it is to choose end-to-end functionality. Idk, it doesn’t seem so controversial to me. I’d wait and see before calling it half-baked.
Re:We're building a browser when it's supposed to be impossible by HelloNurse on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @10:44AM (#35525892)
A vertical slice of the properly integrated features needed by some practical use case is certainly more efficient and effective than implementing the whole of a large API (e.g. some fancy recent, unproven and unstable CSS module) "in a vacuum", getting numerous rare cases wrong, and struggling to test the new features.