Re:Microsoft fixes 5-year-old Defender bug, reducing Firefox...
by SketchySeaBeast on Monday April 10, 2023 @01:58PM
(#35515218)
I don't know if that's the case. I'm a Firefox user but consider all the 3rd party apps nearly as much malware as the things they are trying to solve. I run strictly defender and try to make good choices when downloading and browsing.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Microsoft fixes 5-year-old Defender bug, reducing Firefox...
by UberFly on Monday April 10, 2023 @02:42PM
(#35515787)
I actually replace Defender with a 3rd party choice (Eset) for this very same reason - to wrestle some control over my OS from Microsoft. I find Defender to be overbearing in so many ways.
Re:Microsoft fixes 5-year-old Defender bug, reducing Firefox...
by chillstreem on Monday April 10, 2023 @02:01PM
(#35515259)
well, if we're taking strictly subjective personal experiences as some sort of a relevant benchmark, then I'm a Windows Firefox user that has never used MS defender for any length of time, and always strictly a reliable low-impact 3rd party AV like ESET or Emsisoft. so I guess the two of us cancel each other out.
Re:Microsoft fixes 5-year-old Defender bug, reducing Firefox...
by SketchySeaBeast on Monday April 10, 2023 @02:10PM
(#35515364)
So based upon rigorous analysis, approximately half of all Firefox users use the default choice, and half use a different AV.