Re:Apple Continues Efforts to Keep Retail Stores from Unioni...
by bluefirebrand on Sunday April 09, 2023 @07:34PM
(#35507529)
> it could be construed as promising benefits to employees to discourage their union support, which violates the NLRA [0]
Ok, but there is nothing stopping them from approaching the union with the proposed new benefit.
Sure, but it could be construed as promising benefits to employees to discourage their union support, which violates the NLRA [0] and indeed was cited by Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp. in the dispute against them back in 2019 [1]. No company with a sane legal department would treat a counterparty differently than the contract stipulates, even if such a treatment could be considered 'preferential.' The legal risk is just too great.
[0]https://eclkc.ohs.acf.hhs.gov/human-resources/article/nation... [1]https://ogletree.com/insights/nlrb-explains-when-granting-be...