IRL, that means you can only successfully sell battery propelled moving machines if you have people buying them in excess, given enough people have been properly conditioned to consume them. Sometimes pre-existing conditioning leads to market breakthrough, some other times the need for profit call for conditioning fabrication, so-called consent manufacturing. Leading causes of eco-anxiety, which partly drives the market for such machines, comes from both sides.
Wanna break the cycle? Be absolutely critical of each and every choice you make, considering that you are already fully conditioned on many aspects, and that there are no small choices in life.
In a single hour, the amount of power from the sun that strikes the Earth is more than the entire world consumes in an year.
The physics are there, if cars go electric and it drives the price of electricity up, it makes it much more cost-effective to build new solar panels (because the profit you make on them is high). Basically this is the magic of supply and demand -- when there isn't a monopoly it practically forces society toward a direction good for all. If we taxed externalities we'd already be heading there.
Then there's the fact that Russia is a top 3 worldwide producer of half of that list.
Unless cars weigh 500kg or we limit ourselves to electric bikes, we cannot make enough electric cars, and there is not enough carbon free power either to charge all those cars.
The world would require so much nuclear energy, and it's not possible to have both wind turbines, solar panels and electric cars and electric storage when there is no sun or wind.
I'm tired of techno-optimists who cannot understand we need degrowth BEFORE we can use new technologies if we really want to lower carbon emissions.
There is so much greenwashing it's just not funny anymore. Why can't we understand that all those companies are trying to save themselves instead of delivering realistic, proven ways to reduce co2 emissions?