Re:Do judges give out tougher sentences when hungry? A study...
by satvikpendem on Saturday April 08, 2023 @11:09AM
(#35493956)
Indeed, the book The Quick Fix goes over exactly this point. For example, did you know that the Superman pose had no scientific evidence whatsoever? The researcher simply pushed for it because it made her feel good. The grit study by Angela Duckworth is similarly faulty, the cadet training camp she went to had a pass rate of over 90% so the ones who didn't pass weren't in a statistically significant group to show whether their grittiness actually meant anything to them failing or passing.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Do judges give out tougher sentences when hungry? A study...
by sdenton4 on Saturday April 08, 2023 @11:59AM
(#35494547)
Here's some incontrovertible evidence of the effectiveness of the Superman position.
Re:Do judges give out tougher sentences when hungry? A study...
by stametseater on Saturday April 08, 2023 @01:21PM
(#35495488)
I heard this is so effective, they had to ban it to keep the sport safe and fair.
Re:Do judges give out tougher sentences when hungry? A study...
by getlawgdon on Saturday April 08, 2023 @03:33PM
(#35496765)
If everyone can do it, isnt it fair?
Re:Do judges give out tougher sentences when hungry? A study...
by stametseater on Sunday April 09, 2023 @10:23AM
(#35502988)
It's like steroids in baseball. Anybody could do it so in that sense it may be fair, but it's unfair to all the players who aren't utterly reckless and short sighted.
Re:Do judges give out tougher sentences when hungry? A study...
by geoduck14 on Saturday April 08, 2023 @01:44PM
(#35495766)
So... I do think the superman position is effective, but I don't think a single video without any auditing is considered "incontrovertible evidence"
Re:Do judges give out tougher sentences when hungry? A study...
by satvikpendem on Saturday April 08, 2023 @02:56PM
(#35496420)
I think you missed the joke of the video.