Re:Codeberg – Fast Open Source Alternative to GitHub
by mort96 on Friday April 07, 2023 @09:01AM
(#35481133)
Wow, entitled much? Nobody owes you anything, nobody is obliged to host your code. If you want to use the same UI for your closed/work projects and your FOSS projects, you can host your own instance; Forgejo is FOSS. Codeberg seems to be focused at providing a free service to the FOSS community, _and that's okay_. You don't get to be mad at that.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Codeberg – Fast Open Source Alternative to GitHub
by misnome on Friday April 07, 2023 @09:14AM
(#35481240)
You do if they are advertising as an alternative - that is specifically inviting comparisons.
Re:Codeberg – Fast Open Source Alternative to GitHub
by mort96 on Friday April 07, 2023 @09:18AM
(#35481269)
They advertise themselves as an alternative to GitHub for FOSS projects. Nothing wrong with that.
Re:Codeberg – Fast Open Source Alternative to GitHub
by cinntaile on Friday April 07, 2023 @09:55AM
(#35481576)
The title of this HN post doesn't reflect that, Codeberg itself is clear about that though. Instead it should be "Codeberg - Fast Open Source Github Alternative for FOSS projects"
Re:Codeberg – Fast Open Source Alternative to GitHub
by ipaddr on Friday April 07, 2023 @04:51PM
(#35486822)
People are entitled to reactions to ads. This is an ad.. this is one reaction.
Parent will not use.. I'm guessing you won't use them over github. If 1% readership uses them I would be shocked. 99% of the people commenting won't use them.
Now you are saying people can't express themselves because nothing is owed. For every ad watched a comment is owed by the watcher. That's owed.
Re:Codeberg – Fast Open Source Alternative to GitHub
by mort96 on Friday April 07, 2023 @06:24PM
(#35487818)
Sir when someone on their own volition shares a service they find useful, that's not an ad. It's an ad if Codeberg is in any way involved. Do we have a reason to believe they are? Nothing in this Oblio user's page suggest any involvement with Codeberg.