News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Defamed by ChatGPT: Law professor libeled from whole cloth by mysterydip on Thursday April 06, 2023 @07:30PM (#35475961)
> If somebody asks ChatGPT to generate some accusation, doesn't check if they're factual, and then publishes them anywhere, then the responsibility lies with somebody.

What happens when new models have scraped factually wrong data about a person that has propogated, then someone asks the next chatgpt "tell me about person x" and it spits out the bad learned data?

Re:Defamed by ChatGPT: Law professor libeled from whole cloth by pixelbath on Thursday April 06, 2023 @07:34PM (#35476002)
How is the future bad data different from the current bad data?
Re:Defamed by ChatGPT: Law professor libeled from whole cloth by mysterydip on Thursday April 06, 2023 @09:11PM (#35476813)
A generation will grow up asking an AI all its questions with implicit trust in the results. While this happens to a degree now with seerch engines and wikipedia, there's multiple sources you can check.