You can believe that if you want. Without factual references to back up what you're saying, though - it's just a a flat, sweeping assertion.
See all the evidence here:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35468886
Or even an arch-Cold Warrior like Robert Conquest, who literally wrote a book about it:
>In response to criticism from R. W. Davies and Stephen G. Wheatcroft following the opening of Soviet archives Conquest responded in a 2003 letter that he did not believe "Stalin purposely inflicted the 1933 famine. No. What I argue is that with resulting famine imminent, he could have prevented it, but put “Soviet interest” other than feeding the starving first – thus consciously abetting it."
It really doesn't bother me.
Stalin was an ethnic Georgian. Why would he do that?
What "non-biased" sources would you recommend?
It's also not very wild, from a historical point of view, for an authoritarian leader to destroy or decimate ethnic groups or communities. In fact, it's extremely common, as it is an effective way of consolidating power.
> "that region had regular famines and dry seasons in the past, before USSR too, and it only stopped after 40s, when various actions were taken to improve agricultural stability there" - care to elaborate on this?