Re:Can Injection: keyless car theft
by mayormcmatt on Wednesday April 05, 2023 @12:34PM
(#35456800)
I never got the impression the previous poster was saying this is a benefit for consumers; he's saying it's for the manufacturer, to cut costs.
Edit: that being said, all your points are completely valid.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Can Injection: keyless car theft
by spookthesunset on Wednesday April 05, 2023 @03:24PM
(#35459178)
It is a benefit for consumers. Lower weight for better fuel. More fancy gizmos on the car for a lower price.
... until it breaks and now, as the person above said, you've got a three-digit repair bill.
It's often the case that consumers will seek out the lowest price no matter how high the cost.
I own a vehicle built in 1981. I can absolutely assure you that CAN is better for consumers. People seem to forget the two-inch thick bundles of wires, the hours spent tracing one turn indicator cable, the insulation of the cables in the middle starting to rot and things shorting out, water getting trapped in bundles, failures modes including stuff melting inside the dashboard from high-current stuff all being wired back to a central place... I could go on.
Not having to rerun a bunch of cables is a huge boon. CAN bus and other digital control mechanisms are a god send for maintenance and upgradability.
Re:Can Injection: keyless car theft
by Schroedingersat on Wednesday April 05, 2023 @10:52PM
(#35463521)
The exact same way printers with drm benefit the consumer!
How do you say this with a straight face?