News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Usenet Archive (1981 – 1991) by jas8425 on Wednesday April 05, 2023 @11:39AM (#35455987)
Clicking through at random and found this post asking for support for protesters in "Tian-An-Men Square": https://usenet.trashworldnews.com/?thread=789653
Re:Usenet Archive (1981 – 1991) by nequo on Wednesday April 05, 2023 @01:04PM (#35457235)
Here's a thread on the birth of Haskell in 1990.[1] Simon Peyton Jones was writing about GHC supporting parallelization, and the team lacking access to hardware that supports shared memory for testing:

  Good news: we are; we have a parallel implementation running on the
  GRIP multiprocessor, with absolute wall-clock speedup over the same
  programs running on a comparable uniprocessor (never to be taken 
  for granted!).  This has only recently sprung to life, so it will be
  a while before we can report proper results.

  Bad news: it only runs on GRIP at present, so that rather limits its
  distribution.  We have access to a Meiko transputer machine, but it
  is quite a lot harder to deal with a distributed memory architecture.  The
  compiler would port rather easily to a shared-memory multiprocessor,
  but we don't have access to one at present.
[1] https://usenet.trashworldnews.com/?thread=878480
Re:Usenet Archive (1981 – 1991) by JohnFen on Wednesday April 05, 2023 @01:36PM (#35457708)
Boy, do I miss usenet news. It was a bright, shining star of the internet. Nothing comparable rose to replace it after Google killed it.
Re:Usenet Archive (1981 – 1991) by kolinko on Wednesday April 05, 2023 @03:01PM (#35458920)
Google was a part of it. But spam, and a lack of proper moderation was really the issue.

A bigger issue was that Google buried all the archives from the Usenet with it.

Re:Usenet Archive (1981 – 1991) by JohnFen on Wednesday April 05, 2023 @03:41PM (#35459376)
Spam was a constant issue, yes, like it is today. But you did at least have reasonable tools to minimize the impact of it.

> A bigger issue was that Google buried all the archives from the Usenet with it.

Indeed. Killing usenet was bad. Burying the archives was unforgivable.

Re:Usenet Archive (1981 – 1991) by kjs3 on Wednesday April 05, 2023 @03:40PM (#35459374)
Not sure what this is supposed to be, since it's a tiny fraction of the Usenet messages posted during that decade (less than 1%?). But it was nice at a quick glance to see some names I hadn't seen in 30 years.