News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We need a much more sophisticated debate about AI by og_kalu on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @07:38PM (#35447298)
you're missing the point entirely. that was just an illustration to show how little internals matter in the face of results and actions.

"it's just a simulation" is not the shield you think it is. not when models interact with the real world.

Re:We need a much more sophisticated debate about AI by danaris on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @10:51PM (#35448700)
I think you're mixing up "humanity" with "Silicon Valley techbros".

Everyone I've talked to about LLMs outside of this forum sees them as an amusing entertainment, and possibly occasionally useful for a few suggestions. Not something that's going to change their world any time soon, and certainly not anything that we should be trusting with anything sensitive in any way. Literally everyone.

In any case, I think you're really missing what the actual question was that I was responding to: Would conferring legal personhood change my mind about actual personhood.

The ability to do harm is not, in my mind, particularly relevant to questions of personhood. In fact, I would think that a much better indicator thereof would be the ability to choose not to do harm, given the capability, and someone trying to make you do so.

Re:We need a much more sophisticated debate about AI by coldtea on Wednesday April 05, 2023 @06:31AM (#35451918)
>In any case, I think you're really missing what the actual question was that I was responding to: Would conferring legal personhood change my mind about actual personhood.

Well, "conferring legal personhood" would mandatorily (by law) fix your behavior and professional conduct against one.

And it will also change education etc - you will be taught in official textbooks that it's a person and you should consider it as such.

This might not change your mind, but will change the minds of most kids being taught that.