News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Goldman Sachs Predicts 300M Jobs Will Be Lost or Degraded by AI. Parent comment

Re:Goldman Sachs Predicts 300M Jobs Will Be Lost or Degraded... by _manifold on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @06:31PM (#35446728)
> The one good thing I see out of the coming AI cambrian explosion is that it'll hit the bracket of top 10% to 1% earners the hardest, while those above and bellow are safer.

What are you basing this on? Perhaps I'm missing your exact meaning of "AI cambrian explosion" but right now I think it's arguable that artists and writers are the most threatened by this wave of generative AI - neither of which are usually considered top paying positions.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Goldman Sachs Predicts 300M Jobs Will Be Lost or Degraded... by mihaic on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @07:16PM (#35447134)
I'm mostly trying to extrapolate from current code and text generation abilities, so I know any prediction has a high chance of striking out.

Legal professionals that work on boilerplate could see simple contract generation being taken away from them for instance, and even run-of-the-mill developers could see themselves competing against much cheaper app/website generators.

Even if you can beat the AI, you might be forced to make your rates more competitive since the new baseline solution anyone can get for $10 would be a lot better than before.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Goldman Sachs Predicts 300M Jobs Will Be Lost or Degraded... by worrycue on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @09:04PM (#35447923)
> Legal professionals that work on boilerplate could see simple contract generation being taken away from them for instance, and even run-of-the-mill developers could see themselves competing against much cheaper app/website generators.

I don’t think people will use AI in its current (hallucinating) state if there is money or lives on the line.

[ Parent | on HN ]