Re:Finland becomes the 31st member of NATO
by tim333 on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @02:28PM
(#35443989)
NATO was formed basically as a club for democratic states to defend themselves from aggressive dictatorships, in practice mostly Russia. Unless Russia adopts democracy and human rights it's a bit impractical for it to work with or join NATO.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Finland becomes the 31st member of NATO
by skissane on Wednesday April 05, 2023 @03:57AM
(#35450811)
> NATO was formed basically as a club for democratic states to defend themselves from aggressive dictatorships
One of NATO’s founding members was Portugal - under the Salazar dictatorship. Both Greece and Turkey went through periods of military dictatorship while NATO members-did NATO have any problem with that? The idea that NATO was formed to be a “club for democratic states” ignores its own history
Re:Finland becomes the 31st member of NATO
by foverzar on Wednesday April 05, 2023 @09:13AM
(#35453579)
> NATO was formed basically as a club for democratic states to defend themselves from aggressive dictatorships
This is a historically inaccurate slogan.
> Unless Russia adopts democracy and human rights it's a bit impractical for it to work with or join NATO.
Are we still talking about 1990s-2000s? Russia was no less democratic and adoptive of human rights than other ex-Soviet states pushed to NATO. Do you actually consider 2004 Georgia to be more in line with western view of human rights and democracy then 2004 Russia, really?