Re:We need a much more sophisticated debate about AI
by thisgoesnowhere on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @10:08AM
(#35439872)
What does this offer over a place like twitter where the exact same conversation is playing out in public right now?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:We need a much more sophisticated debate about AI
by kajaktum on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @12:35PM
(#35442294)
You can use the distributed proof to say that these accounts belong to you. So if you are doubtful about the integrity of a post, you can look up their blockchain ID and find out what have they been doing elsewhere publicly. Additionally, any post that does not attach a blockchain tag or something will simply get filtered out or ignored. This puts every "anonymous" post on the web a weight which it does not have in the age of LLM.
Re:We need a much more sophisticated debate about AI
by burnished on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @02:36PM
(#35444091)
How are you guaranteeing that this ID corresponds to a real human bean? Blockchain seems terrible for this on the basis of complete reliance on an external central authority.
Re:We need a much more sophisticated debate about AI
by kajaktum on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @06:14PM
(#35446538)
It doesn't but you can always augment your ID by attaching a government ID or some sort. On the internet tho? If you _only_ have texts, there is no feasible way to distinguish a person and a bot.