News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Experts warn yearly checkups carry risks and do not reduc... by noirbot on Monday April 03, 2023 @05:26PM (#35431505)
It somewhat makes sense to me. Measuring all the time, you're susceptible to odd readings that are essentially false positives. If your device has a 1/1000 false positive rate, but you're usually only making one reading with it at a time, that's maybe acceptable. If you're making a million readings over a week because you're checking every second, than you're almost definitely going to have it show the same false positive enough that it looks real.
Re:Experts warn yearly checkups carry risks and do not reduc... by Dylan16807 on Monday April 03, 2023 @07:00PM (#35432549)
But the situation you describe only makes it look real if you were trained incorrectly, so that's a very important factor.
Re:Experts warn yearly checkups carry risks and do not reduc... by secabeen on Monday April 03, 2023 @07:06PM (#35432605)
Yep, it's a form of the Base Rate Fallacy:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_rate_fallacy