Re:Finland Becomes a Member of NATO on Tuesday 4 April
by khochesh_kushat on Monday April 03, 2023 @10:53AM
(#35424634)
If we free ourselves of the bounds of what is technically true, then we can justify nearly anything. I'm not sure it's a productive line of reasoning.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Finland Becomes a Member of NATO on Tuesday 4 April
by Animatronio on Monday April 03, 2023 @10:59AM
(#35424751)
What are you trying to say here? Technically true is still true, so we should take it into account when making a decision.
Re:Finland Becomes a Member of NATO on Tuesday 4 April
by khochesh_kushat on Monday April 03, 2023 @11:01AM
(#35424798)
That we should take into account that NATO is already 'at their doorstep', regardless of which weapon systems are where, since they can be deployed anywhere later.
Re:Finland Becomes a Member of NATO on Tuesday 4 April
by Animatronio on Monday April 03, 2023 @11:12AM
(#35425027)
Then you'll have no problem explaining this:
https://www.anews.com.tr/world/2023/03/26/poland-nuclear-arm...
while also this:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/oct/05/poland-us-nucl...
Re:Finland Becomes a Member of NATO on Tuesday 4 April
by khochesh_kushat on Monday April 03, 2023 @11:21AM
(#35425214)
I'm not sure what part you are asking me to explain to you? They seem relatively self-explanatory.