News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Stable Diffusion copyright lawsuits could be a legal earthquake for AI. Parent comment

Re:Stable Diffusion copyright lawsuits could be a legal eart... by blibble on Monday April 03, 2023 @10:14AM (#35423906)
> That being said, nothing is stopping Getty images, for example, from releasing their own image generator, trained from images they own copyright to.

which is fine, if it's theirs they're free to do what they want with it

however I didn't give Microsoft permission to sell people code derived from my works without attribution

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stable Diffusion copyright lawsuits could be a legal eart... by tough on Monday April 03, 2023 @10:42AM (#35424423)
Funny because getty will steal public domain images and charge you 200$ for it
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stable Diffusion copyright lawsuits could be a legal eart... by jacquesm on Monday April 03, 2023 @11:00AM (#35424775)
That's a different discussion. Getty is clearly in the wrong there, but it has nothing to do with AI.
[ Parent | on HN ]