News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Stable Diffusion copyright lawsuits could be a legal earthquake for AI. Parent comment

Re:Stable Diffusion copyright lawsuits could be a legal eart... by KyeRussell on Monday April 03, 2023 @09:57AM (#35423647)
As someone that’s undecided on this whole issue, your particular argument comes across as so tone-deaf that I didn’t think that you genuinely believed it when you wrote it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stable Diffusion copyright lawsuits could be a legal eart... by fauxpause_ on Monday April 03, 2023 @10:03AM (#35423737)
Which piece was tone deaf? That AI is a tool? Because it is a tool. Using it to copy a work is a problem with copyright. Using it because it is capable of violating copyright is not.

Or that style is not copyrighted? Because it’s not.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stable Diffusion copyright lawsuits could be a legal eart... by shinycode on Monday April 03, 2023 @11:45AM (#35425757)
I don’t know precisely what lies behind the french IP when they state :

> In the case of partial use of the work, it is assessed according to the similarities between the works

Similarities could be understood as style maybe ? It’s not a clear cut

[ Parent | on HN ]