Re:Reducing Iron Oxide with Ammonia: A Sustainable Path to G...
by lmm on Sunday April 02, 2023 @08:50PM
(#35417149)
So the UK, with about 4.7% the population of China, produces 0.7% as much steel, i.e. the ratios are within an order of magnitude. And presumably what works in the UK will work in China too.
Re:Reducing Iron Oxide with Ammonia: A Sustainable Path to G...
by peterashford on Sunday April 02, 2023 @08:52PM
(#35417176)
Almost every individual action by a single emitter makes a tiny contribution to AGW.
Re:Reducing Iron Oxide with Ammonia: A Sustainable Path to G...
by lazide on Sunday April 02, 2023 @09:47PM
(#35417574)
If the technology is developed and proven in a smaller economy, then it can be expanded to the bigger one by said smaller economy.
Re:Reducing Iron Oxide with Ammonia: A Sustainable Path to G...
by justinclift on Monday April 03, 2023 @04:44AM
(#35420404)
Doesn't China have a free pass with their emissions through to 2030, due to their "developing country" status?
Pretty sure that's the case, though they have to start reducing their emissions after that like the rest of us.
China producuces a little over 1 billion metric tonnes per annum
By what measure is this not futile?