News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Auto-GPT: An Autonomous GPT-4 Experiment. Parent comment

Re:Auto-GPT: An Autonomous GPT-4 Experiment by krainboltgreene on Sunday April 02, 2023 @06:25PM (#35415923)
Lets assume for a moment that I haven't read any papers in those fields, that I don't have any childrens, that I haven't trained any LLMs or worked in "reinforcement learning", or even read any computer science papers in the last 20 years (the answer to 90% of that is yes): I don't have to be an expert in physics to know that pastors can't levitate, regardless of what they claim.

You're mad that I'm calling you out, I get it, but you gotta understand after the 200th time of seeing this unfounded sentiment bandied about I'm not phased.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Auto-GPT: An Autonomous GPT-4 Experiment by startupsfail on Sunday April 02, 2023 @06:42PM (#35416050)
This statement is a theory and it is not a widely accepted or a proven one. Yet, I do see it in my lab research notebooks on generative AI (that date at ~2017). I think it is a good theory. Haven’t seen anything that contradicts it badly so far…

If you haven’t done the above, I’d suggest doing it. It’s fun and gives a good perspective :)

[ Parent | on HN ]