Re:Auto-GPT: An Autonomous GPT-4 Experiment
by startupsfail on Sunday April 02, 2023 @06:06PM
(#35415769)
Like what expert? And who are you exactly to state that this is wrong, that boldly? Are you an expert? How many neuroscience and psychology papers have you read? Do you have any children? Have you trained any LLMs? Have you worked with reinforcement learning? Or how many computer science papers have you read during last two decades?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Auto-GPT: An Autonomous GPT-4 Experiment
by krainboltgreene on Sunday April 02, 2023 @06:25PM
(#35415923)
Lets assume for a moment that I haven't read any papers in those fields, that I don't have any childrens, that I haven't trained any LLMs or worked in "reinforcement learning", or even read any computer science papers in the last 20 years (the answer to 90% of that is yes): I don't have to be an expert in physics to know that pastors can't levitate, regardless of what they claim.
You're mad that I'm calling you out, I get it, but you gotta understand after the 200th time of seeing this unfounded sentiment bandied about I'm not phased.
Re:Auto-GPT: An Autonomous GPT-4 Experiment
by startupsfail on Sunday April 02, 2023 @06:42PM
(#35416050)
This statement is a theory and it is not a widely accepted or a proven one. Yet, I do see it in my lab research notebooks on generative AI (that date at ~2017). I think it is a good theory. Haven’t seen anything that contradicts it badly so far…
If you haven’t done the above, I’d suggest doing it. It’s fun and gives a good perspective :)