Re:Grand Jury Votes to Indict Donald Trump
by lisasays on Saturday April 01, 2023 @12:14AM
(#35397057)
Which felony-class (or other criminal) violations, specifically, do you maintain that Clinton should have been indicted for, but wasn't?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Grand Jury Votes to Indict Donald Trump
by brigandish on Saturday April 01, 2023 @08:22AM
(#35399672)
Where did I write that she should've been indicted?
I didn't. Thanks for taking the time to properly read my comments in future.
Re:Grand Jury Votes to Indict Donald Trump
by lisasays on Saturday April 01, 2023 @05:26PM
(#35404246)
Your exact words were, "I'm all for prosecuting Trump and Clinton."
Don't try to take it back now.
Re:Grand Jury Votes to Indict Donald Trump
by brigandish on Saturday April 01, 2023 @08:02PM
(#35405550)
a) That's not a should.
b) It's an example of lack of discrimination, not a wish or obligation to have them prosecuted - I'm all for prosecuting Trump and Clinton. I could've written Biden or Pelosi, or Clinton B.
c) You're tumbling in the weeds now.
My advice, you mucked up in your reading - of the article you mentioned and of my comments - and you're clearly finding it hard to deal with having that pointed out. Just take it, learn from it, and move on. Arguing about it like I care about Republicans or Trump isn't going to get you anywhere. It's certainly not going to magic up anything that matches what's happening to Trump, like a charge for Hillary.