News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Grand Jury Votes to Indict Donald Trump by lisasays on Saturday April 01, 2023 @12:14AM (#35397057)
Which felony-class (or other criminal) violations, specifically, do you maintain that Clinton should have been indicted for, but wasn't?
Re:Grand Jury Votes to Indict Donald Trump by brigandish on Saturday April 01, 2023 @08:22AM (#35399672)
Where did I write that she should've been indicted?

I didn't. Thanks for taking the time to properly read my comments in future.

Re:Grand Jury Votes to Indict Donald Trump by lisasays on Saturday April 01, 2023 @05:26PM (#35404246)
Your exact words were, "I'm all for prosecuting Trump and Clinton."

Don't try to take it back now.

Re:Grand Jury Votes to Indict Donald Trump by brigandish on Saturday April 01, 2023 @08:02PM (#35405550)
a) That's not a should.

b) It's an example of lack of discrimination, not a wish or obligation to have them prosecuted - I'm all for prosecuting Trump and Clinton. I could've written Biden or Pelosi, or Clinton B.

c) You're tumbling in the weeds now.

My advice, you mucked up in your reading - of the article you mentioned and of my comments - and you're clearly finding it hard to deal with having that pointed out. Just take it, learn from it, and move on. Arguing about it like I care about Republicans or Trump isn't going to get you anywhere. It's certainly not going to magic up anything that matches what's happening to Trump, like a charge for Hillary.