Re:ChatGPT – The Revolutionary Bullshit Parrot
by nottorp on Friday March 31, 2023 @06:53PM
(#35394860)
> The anti-parrot arguers claim that's basically how humans work too (even the smarter ones), and that just because ChatGPT is a "parrot" doesn't necessarily mean it cannot be as good or better than humans. It might not be entirely there yet, but it's just a matter of time it becomes a good enough parrot to be indistinguishable/better than humans.
Which humans? There may be a correlation between people who are capable of watching Netflix quality series for 4-5 seasons of more of the same and admirers of ChatGPT.
Basically if "content" (as opposed to "art" or attempts at art) does not bother you, ChatGPT does a good enough job already.
On the other hand, the most vocal opponents imagine themselves in a world where not 90% but 99.999% is blogspam and Netflix. Making entertainment worth watching impossible to find.
Which humans? There may be a correlation between people who are capable of watching Netflix quality series for 4-5 seasons of more of the same and admirers of ChatGPT.
Basically if "content" (as opposed to "art" or attempts at art) does not bother you, ChatGPT does a good enough job already.
On the other hand, the most vocal opponents imagine themselves in a world where not 90% but 99.999% is blogspam and Netflix. Making entertainment worth watching impossible to find.