Llama.cpp 30B runs with only 6GB of RAM now

Re:Llama.cpp 30B runs with only 6GB of RAM now by bakkoting on Friday March 31, 2023 @05:14PM (#35393753)

Some results here: https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/discussions/406

tl;dr quantizing the 13B model gives up about 30% of the improvement you get from moving from 7B to 13B - so quantized 13B is still much better than unquantized 7B. Similar results for the larger models.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Llama.cpp 30B runs with only 6GB of RAM now by terafo on Friday March 31, 2023 @05:30PM (#35393937)

I wonder where such difference between llama.cpp and [1] repo comes from. F16 difference in perplexity is .3 on 7B model, which is not insignificant. ggml quirks are definitely need to be fixed.

[1] https://github.com/qwopqwop200/GPTQ-for-LLaMa

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Llama.cpp 30B runs with only 6GB of RAM now by bakkoting on Friday March 31, 2023 @06:06PM (#35394332)

I'd guess the GPTQ-for-LLaMa repo is using a larger context size. Poking around it looks like GPTQ-for-llama is specifying 2048 [1] vs the default 512 for llama.cpp [2]. You can just specify a longer size on the CLI for llama.cpp if you are OK with the extra memory.

[1] https://github.com/qwopqwop200/GPTQ-for-LLaMa/blob/934034c8e...

[2] https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/tree/3525899277d2e2bd...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Llama.cpp 30B runs with only 6GB of RAM now by gliptic on Friday March 31, 2023 @06:09PM (#35394357)

GPTQ-for-LLaMa recently implemented some quantization tricks suggested by the GPTQ authors that improved 7B especially. Maybe llama.cpp hasn't been evaluated with those in place?

[ Parent | on HN ]