Evidence? And offspring doing something on their own doesn't count.
> illegal immigrants in order to sway voter demographics
That's not how voting works.
> dossier full of lies about your opponent
Sure that one counts. Sometimes both choices are bad. But one candidate doing something bad doesn't mean you increase what the other candidate can get away with.
https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-reveals-biden-fami...
Hunter Biden's business partner outlines Joe Biden's involvement
https://nypost.com/2020/10/22/hunter-ex-partner-tony-bobulin...
Monthly encounters with migrants at U.S.-Mexico border remain near record highs
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2023/01/13/monthly-enc...
You'd have to be pretty naive not to acknowledge the long-term benefits to the Democratic party of increasing the Hispanic demographic. An incredible betrayal of democracy.
And as we know the Russian collusion dossier ran for years in the media. All complete lies.
And I haven't mentioned the pressure on social media companies to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story priority to an election (the facts of which were all true).
You'll note that at no point has anybody been held to account for any of the above.
But if you (alledgedly) paid some hush money to a woman 7 years ago (years past the statute of limitations) well, you're gonna be held to account then of course.
"The evidence sits on these three phones, I don’t want to go into anything any further. This will all be discussed with Senator Johnson and his committee and the American people can decide what’s fact"
That's pretty weak.
> You'd have to be pretty naive not to acknowledge the long-term benefits to the Democratic party of increasing the Hispanic demographic. An incredible betrayal of democracy.
Children that are born here, voting decades from now? They're not just going to blindly follow one party. That's not a betrayal of democracy.
> You'll note that at no point has anybody been held to account for any of the above.
You can't hold someone to account for making a bad dossier any more than you can hold candidates to account for saying random awful things about people. I don't know what you expect to see beyond voter dissatisfaction, which happened in droves.
And strictness of border enforcement is something the president legitimately gets to decide.
I don't know about pressure related to the laptop story and don't really want to get deeper into tangents right now.
> But if you (alledgedly) paid some hush money to a woman 7 years ago (years past the statute of limitations) well, you're gonna be held to account then of course.
The accusation is (probably) based on hiding campaign fund spending.
"They're not just going to blindly follow one party." Of course not, of course there will be exceptions but in the whole Hispanics tend to vote Democrat.
https://www.pewresearch.org/race-ethnicity/2022/09/29/most-l...
"And strictness of border enforcement is something the president legitimately gets to decide." Lol...either laws are enforced or they are not. And in this case it's obvious why they choose not to enforce and I'II say again, an incredible betrayal of democracy.
"I don't know about pressure related to the laptop story and don't really want to get deeper into tangents right now...". Of course not, it's too damning, clear and obvious of the ridiculous double-standards at play. Are you more informed on the Trump hush money thing? I'm guessing almost certainly not.
Are you seriously going to suggest this charge would have been brought against any other person than Trump?
Strong evidence is whatever is supposedly on those phones. Which he didn't share.
> Hispanics tend to vote Democrat.
Still not undermining democracy.
> Lol...either laws are enforced or they are not.
Choosing how to implement laws is half the point of the executive.
> Of course not, it's too damning, clear and obvious of the ridiculous double-standards at play.
Hunter is not a politician. I only care so much about him being corrupt.
> Are you seriously going to suggest this charge would have been brought against any other person than Trump?
We don't know what the charges are but it seems like similar charges have been brought against other politicians.
Would that include running your family as a syndicate so that your offspring makes shady deals with the US's primary geo-strategic competitor and then distributes the proceeds amongst the family?
Or what about opening a border to record numbers of illegal immigrants in order to sway voter demographics in your favor? Is that morally ambiguous?
Or what about putting out a fake Russian collusion dossier full of lies about your opponent that ran in the media for years? Could this be seen as morally ambiguous?
What's your definition of the term?