This seems like an odd choice - unless you already bought a supply of lead-acid batteries for the next 50 years or so.
I've read about a car using supercapacitors in the regenerative brakes to capture energy at high current and, then let it trickle back into the main batteries (or drivetrain) at levels that won't damage it.
Many laptops had both a lithium ion battery and a watch battery used to keep the bios and an internal clock running after the battery died. https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/why-does-my-motherboard-have-a...
Both lead acid and supercaps are not even remotely comparable to the main liion battery, they're suppliments, and not interesting ones
As for 12V, all one needs is a regulator. Unless you have a long-term supply contract (that, I bet, won't be renewed for too long), a lead-acid battery is just dead weight.
https://insideevs.com/news/546087/tesla-liion-12v-auxiliary-...
When Sandy Munro interviewed Elon Musk a couple of years ago he said "Why are you still using 12v stuff in the cabin?"
Musk's answer was that the automotive supply chain was entirely geared around 12v equipment and they had to take advantage of that to get to market quickly.
I'm glad those days are almost over.
And before you say "oh, but they could just use a voltage converter from the high voltage battery", they need to consider that some accessories use hundreds of amps briefly (eg. the power steering - that makes for an expensive voltage converter), and the car still needs to operate lights and stuff while the high voltage battery is offline (eg. after an isolation fault).
For all of the above reasons, the lead acid battery is still there, even though a clean sheet design would never have one.
Having multiple chemistries in one battery pack is of course possible, but I don't any car who is actually doing that.
This would also allow you to configure or offer cars optimized for the climate they are being used.
I personally also see those news more in 'im 5-10 years' we will have something much better than now.