News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Grand Jury Votes to Indict Donald Trump by staunton on Friday March 31, 2023 @06:00AM (#35384739)
> if I was dealing with such things I would always record every conversation on some tiny recorder

that would also be illegal though, and could not be used in court as evidence? (Not a lawyer, not legal advice) On the other hand, nowadays it's pretty easy to fake voice recordings. I'm not sure if it can be done in a way that is hard to detect by experts.

Re:Grand Jury Votes to Indict Donald Trump by berniedurfee on Friday March 31, 2023 @07:33AM (#35385465)
IANAL, but I think recording the conversation surreptitiously is legal in NY, as long as one party knows they’re being recorded.
Re:Grand Jury Votes to Indict Donald Trump by wolrah on Friday March 31, 2023 @08:47AM (#35386291)
At the US Federal level the law is "one party consent", meaning that someone who is a party to a private conversation can record it without requiring the approval of the other part(y/ies). You can't record someone else's private conversation without approval, but you can record those you are a party to.

Some states have stricter "two party consent" laws which require both/all parties to approve, which is why most national companies put automated warnings in their phone systems if they're recording any calls.