News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google trained Bard on ChatGPT chats from ShareGPT by mdgrech23 on Thursday March 30, 2023 @11:54AM (#35374709)
The argument is these companies are using our ideas created by us humans in this thing called the interenet for free and without attribution and it's problematic.
Re:Google trained Bard on ChatGPT chats from ShareGPT by abstrakraft on Thursday March 30, 2023 @12:14PM (#35375061)
I'm not necessarily arguing against you, but "problematic" is too generic a term to be useful. Genocide is "problematic". Having to run to the bathroom every 5 minutes to blow my runny nose is "problematic". What do you actually mean?
Re:Google trained Bard on ChatGPT chats from ShareGPT by visarga on Thursday March 30, 2023 @12:14PM (#35375057)
You can't own ideas, they got their own life-cycle.
Re:Google trained Bard on ChatGPT chats from ShareGPT by whimsicalism on Thursday March 30, 2023 @12:51PM (#35375641)
Right, but I do think you can "own" (by which I mean our societally-mediated legal definition of ownership in the anglosphere) specific sequences of text or at least the right to copy them?
Re:Google trained Bard on ChatGPT chats from ShareGPT by dimitrios1 on Thursday March 30, 2023 @12:22PM (#35375171)
Responding to sibling comment: We need some clarification here: are we speaking about just ideas in the abstract sense, or ideas that have been fleshed out i.e "materialized"

If the latter, there are many laws that say you can own an idea, provided it exists somewhere.