There's something off about LED bulbs

Re:There's something off about LED bulbs by cratermoon on Thursday March 30, 2023 @11:18AM (#35374018)

You can, but as GP comment said, "Good indoor lighting is now something only people with plenty of disposable income can afford." When you're poor, are you going to cough up $18 for a single bulb, or get a 16-pack for $24 at Home Depot? $288 vs $24.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:There's something off about LED bulbs by Dylan16807 on Thursday March 30, 2023 @05:44PM (#35379192)

So "is now something" implies that incandescent was affordable.

16 incandescent bulbs, averaging 3 hours per day, would cost about 50 cents per day. $150-$250 per year in most of the country.

So getting the really premium LEDs is still cheaper than lighting used to be. Even better if you use the good bulbs for room lighting and the cheap bulbs for closets and outdoors and such.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:There's something off about LED bulbs by cratermoon on Thursday March 30, 2023 @11:52PM (#35382331)

This is not how poor people are able to manage money. When you're living paycheck-to-paycheck, you don't buy $18 bulbs, ever. That $18 is needed for rent, food, and utilities.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:There's something off about LED bulbs by Dylan16807 on Friday March 31, 2023 @12:28AM (#35382559)

> That $18 is needed for rent, food, and utilities.

You say that like the utilities weren't even larger before the change. That $11-18 a month is explicitly not going to utilities.

I'd say those people are getting an upgrade in food or other things at the cost of CRI. And they can choose not to take that trade if they prefer CRI. You only need to buy one bulb at a time, after all, no need for massive savings. And even if you buy the extra fancy $18 bulbs you'll still save some money compared to incandescent.

[ Parent | on HN ]