News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Legacy auto faces unsellable car disaster in China as pol... by tyingq on Thursday March 30, 2023 @07:21AM (#35370967)
I would guess GP was talking about safety, not trying to promote oversized cars.
Re:Legacy auto faces unsellable car disaster in China as pol... by CalRobert on Thursday March 30, 2023 @07:49AM (#35371191)
To be fair, smaller cars are safer.
Re:Legacy auto faces unsellable car disaster in China as pol... by sgent on Thursday March 30, 2023 @08:27AM (#35371565)
Depends on what you mean by safer. If you are hitting an F-150 you will be safer in a F-150 yourself than a smartcar. If you are a pedestrian you would rather be hit by a smartcar.

Many of these Chinese vehicles have the safety features of a 1950's era vehicle, so without airbags, good construction techniques for absorbing force, etc. I imagine they would all get horrible safety ratings by Consumer Reports.

Re:Legacy auto faces unsellable car disaster in China as pol... by wil421 on Thursday March 30, 2023 @08:28AM (#35371583)
A lot of Chinese golf carts would not pass US or EU crash test standards.
Re:Legacy auto faces unsellable car disaster in China as pol... by shakow on Thursday March 30, 2023 @09:37AM (#35372493)
That's a fair point.

However, if energy scarcity pushes us globally toward a situation where we need more essential cars for slower, shorter routes, then it would make sense to downgrade a bit those tests, as the typical use would be closer to a Topolino driving 70km/h on a country road than an M8 dashing at 170km/h on the highway.