Re:Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter
by invig on Wednesday March 29, 2023 @05:59PM
(#35364398)
The corporations pay for people to learn how to do this stuff. Eventually, someone will leave and build the open-source version (when it's feasible to do it / the price has come down).
Re:Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter
by ntr-- on Wednesday March 29, 2023 @08:46PM
(#35366165)
> you cant take all the money!
A cursory reading of the list of signatories shows mostly academics, so your summary of their motivations appears to be incorrect.
> not like that, not by democratizing it, but under OUR CONTROL
I also don't know how you came to that conclusion, from TFA:
> Such decisions must not be delegated to unelected tech leaders
Re:Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter
by jamilton on Wednesday March 29, 2023 @09:11PM
(#35366366)
What do you mean by "democratizing the LLMs"? There are already open source LLMs. Making Claude, GPT-4, and whatever else is being worked on open source wouldn't make them any less capable of doing harm.
Re:Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter
by lannisterstark on Thursday March 30, 2023 @01:30AM
(#35368455)
I mean in the sense of getting capable models in the hands of people, rather than only a few companies who will arguably steer them towards their own goals. The open source models we currently have are vastly inferior to proprietary ones.
Fragmentation reduces any danger. It doesn't amplify it. Imagine just chrome and Google pushing pwas at you.
This also solves the "safety and regulations" issue to an extent - Do you really trust that Microsoft, Google, or govt-entities will not have their own biases and will want to regulate the citizens who want to use their products more, sometimes in unethical ways (because we all know, corps and govts never do anything bad)?
This "Open letter" reeks of "we are behind, let us play catch up, you cant take all the money!" or, of baseless fearmongering where LLMs and future assistants could be used to help countless people with disabilities for example.
"Make the world a better place, but no, not like that, not by democratizing it, but under OUR CONTROL" seems to be the motto here.