Of course there is a point to evolution, which is to utilise the environment to preserve your genes and pass them onto the next generation.
Evolve to slow though and you die, evolve too fast, you’re no longer compatible with your environment and also die.
As I'm not a biologist, I would only be guessing if that corresponds to evolving 1 million times faster, or if the relative complexity of the organisms makes it either more or less than that.
evolution always wins, by definition - whatever wins, that was evolution
> Of course there is a point to evolution, which is to utilise the environment to preserve your genes and pass them onto the next generation.
that is just a concrete mechanism to evolution, albeit a special one for humans as we're a part of it
The thing that makes evolution a special dynamic is that everything that exists and you get to perceive is either the result of evolution, or compatible with it.
Will to life is effectively an artifact of evolution. Things with ways to express some form of persistence and reproduction have an implicit will to live.
Leaving aside whatever goals AIs may be programmed for, if at some point a dynamic for persistence and reproduction appears it will dominate any competing systems that don't have it on that basis alone. Systems that incorporate and propagate useful features for their survival will have capabilities to adapt and persist that are very limited in known lifeforms.