News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Richard Stallman's thoughts on ChatGPT, AI and their impa... by bulbosaur123 on Sunday March 26, 2023 @09:40AM (#35314343)
How can you give human rights to an entity that isn't human?
Re:Richard Stallman's thoughts on ChatGPT, AI and their impa... by ndsipa_pomu on Sunday March 26, 2023 @09:46AM (#35314403)
You amend laws to apply an exception such as with corporations having some human rights
Re:Richard Stallman's thoughts on ChatGPT, AI and their impa... by mc32 on Sunday March 26, 2023 @09:48AM (#35314420)
Define machine rights and grant appropriate rights to qualifying machines… whatever those rights are. Like, what 40 hour workweek or right to be upgraded? Right to free output even if not based on any evidence?
Re:Richard Stallman's thoughts on ChatGPT, AI and their impa... by zakki on Sunday March 26, 2023 @10:03AM (#35314571)
We created machine because nobody wants 24 work-hours. Because we want more productivity. If we gave machines some rights who will do the above for us?
Re:Richard Stallman's thoughts on ChatGPT, AI and their impa... by ElFitz on Sunday March 26, 2023 @10:43AM (#35314959)
The machines’ machines? I mean, why not?
Re:Richard Stallman's thoughts on ChatGPT, AI and their impa... by shagie on Sunday March 26, 2023 @10:08AM (#35314609)
Incorporate.

I realize I'm being a bit facetious here... though as I write that, I'm not sure how accurate that is.

Re:Richard Stallman's thoughts on ChatGPT, AI and their impa... by _a_a_a_ on Sunday March 26, 2023 @10:14AM (#35314669)
You know perfectly well what he's getting at. Call them Common Rights or Sentience Rights or whatever if the word Human is really causing you confusion. FFS is that the best response you have.