News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Judge Decides Against Internet Archive by Dylan16807 on Saturday March 25, 2023 @08:05AM (#35301832)
> The root of copyright issues are (mostly) not about actual copyright, but the length of copyright.

The other issues are getting worse over time. Lack of first sale doctrine. DRM preventing fair use. That Aereo thing where you're not allowed to rent a preconfigured antenna and recorder from someone else.

Re:Judge Decides Against Internet Archive by pbhjpbhj on Saturday March 25, 2023 @08:10AM (#35301869)
Yes, very few works need more than the original 7 years in order for them to get a sufficient return to make them economically viable.
Re:Judge Decides Against Internet Archive by Semaphor on Saturday March 25, 2023 @08:28AM (#35301988)
I wonder if that applies to novels that don’t become bestsellers? A book that simply does okay. People buy it, never a ton of them, but always a few, every few days, for a long time. No idea what the answer is, just something that popped into my head.
Re:Judge Decides Against Internet Archive by Dylan16807 on Saturday March 25, 2023 @08:20AM (#35301934)
When/where was it 7?
Re:Judge Decides Against Internet Archive by pbhjpbhj on Saturday March 25, 2023 @03:06PM (#35305955)
IIRC under the Statute of Anne, it was 7 (plus 7 if you paid again).

It seems like a good balance between private monopoly and public interest for the shirts of artistic works copyright protects.

Re:Judge Decides Against Internet Archive by Dylan16807 on Saturday March 25, 2023 @03:57PM (#35306609)
Statue of Anne was 14+14. I'm not sure exactly if/how payment worked.