Re:Judge Decides Against Internet Archive
by pbhjpbhj on Saturday March 25, 2023 @08:10AM
(#35301869)
Yes, very few works need more than the original 7 years in order for them to get a sufficient return to make them economically viable.
Re:Judge Decides Against Internet Archive
by Semaphor on Saturday March 25, 2023 @08:28AM
(#35301988)
I wonder if that applies to novels that don’t become bestsellers? A book that simply does okay. People buy it, never a ton of them, but always a few, every few days, for a long time. No idea what the answer is, just something that popped into my head.
Re:Judge Decides Against Internet Archive
by Dylan16807 on Saturday March 25, 2023 @08:20AM
(#35301934)
When/where was it 7?
Re:Judge Decides Against Internet Archive
by pbhjpbhj on Saturday March 25, 2023 @03:06PM
(#35305955)
IIRC under the Statute of Anne, it was 7 (plus 7 if you paid again).
It seems like a good balance between private monopoly and public interest for the shirts of artistic works copyright protects.
Re:Judge Decides Against Internet Archive
by Dylan16807 on Saturday March 25, 2023 @03:57PM
(#35306609)
Statue of Anne was 14+14. I'm not sure exactly if/how payment worked.
The other issues are getting worse over time. Lack of first sale doctrine. DRM preventing fair use. That Aereo thing where you're not allowed to rent a preconfigured antenna and recorder from someone else.