News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sam Altman didn’t take any equity in OpenAI, report says by marcusverus on Friday March 24, 2023 @08:05PM (#35297397)
> Musk's claims to want to build an alt-right OpenAI.

I saw Elon push back on GPT's "wokeness"[0], but when did he say he was building an "alt-right" OpenAI?

[0]https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2023/02/09/woke-chatgpt-...

Re:Sam Altman didn’t take any equity in OpenAI, report says by lardo on Friday March 24, 2023 @08:12PM (#35297456)
Replace "alt-(left|right)" with "thing author doesn't like"
Re:Sam Altman didn’t take any equity in OpenAI, report says by SideQuark on Friday March 24, 2023 @09:34PM (#35298198)
Alt-right don't call themselves that. They simply parrot the same beliefs and principles until those beliefs and principles are applied to themselves.
Re:Sam Altman didn’t take any equity in OpenAI, report says by marcusverus on Friday March 24, 2023 @11:37PM (#35299056)
Why do progressives always resort to oblique arguments like this? Are you capable of engaging without resorting to innuendo or broad accusations of bad faith?
Re:Sam Altman didn’t take any equity in OpenAI, report says by SideQuark on Saturday March 25, 2023 @12:56AM (#35299581)
I'm not a progressive. Why do people immediately label others to fit strawmen arguments?

Let's break down the statements:

Is there a movement or group often labeled alt-right?

If so, do they use that phrase to label themselves?

Do they tend to have similar beliefs (say for example support police, nearly unlimited free speech rights, smaller govt, lower spending...)?

When these beliefs are not convenient, do they ignore them? (Ignore police and law for Jan 6, use govt to ban speech and books they dislike, increase govt intrusion for things they like, and ignore their own party running up national debt beyond anyone before Trump),?

I'm pretty sure the above facts are not political at all. They are facts. The hypocrisy has pushed a significant number of lifelong conservatives out of the party. It would be a magical progressive that could simply argue so many conservatives to bail out.

Re:Sam Altman didn’t take any equity in OpenAI, report says by marcusverus on Sunday March 26, 2023 @04:54PM (#35319478)
To reiterate:

> Why do progressives always resort to oblique arguments like this?

None of this has anything to do with whether Elon is supposedly making alt-right OpenAI, or whether Elon is himself alt-right. The only thing you've accomplished is to reveal that you don't know what "alt-right" means.

Re:Sam Altman didn’t take any equity in OpenAI, report says by ben_w on Saturday March 25, 2023 @07:01AM (#35301422)
I remember when they did call themselves that. I can't parse your second sentence.
Re:Sam Altman didn’t take any equity in OpenAI, report says by threeseed on Friday March 24, 2023 @09:39PM (#35298235)
Musk's political views are very much from the alt-right spectrum.

And he has assembled a team to build an OpenAI rival that aligns with this:

https://www.theinformation.com/articles/fighting-woke-ai-mus...

Re:Sam Altman didn’t take any equity in OpenAI, report says by marcusverus on Friday March 24, 2023 @11:36PM (#35299051)
The use of the term “RINO” is common among conservatives and has been for decades. You think that the mere use of this word makes someone “alt-right”? And having uttered this single word, any AI they want to make is necessarily an alt-right AI? Is this a serious argument?

An article link (which hardly even supports your position) is no substitute for an argument.